Maybe we're not talking about the same implementation. I've worked with the Cpp one over the years and never saw it crashing. maybe i'm just lucky :)
--- Fatfingered on a fancy phone. On 5 Mar 2014 00:04, "Kieren Diment" <dim...@gmail.com> wrote: > Gearman's fine until you need a reliable queue. It's certainly less of a > pain to set up than rabbitmq, but if you start with gearman and find you > need reliability after a while there's substantial pain to be experienced > (unless you already know all about your reliable job queue implementation > of choice). > > On 05/03/2014, at 10:35 AM, Jérôme Étévé wrote: > > > - For queuing jobs, I'm a big fan of Gearman. It's light, very stable > > and very simple. > > >