I've tended to use Parallel::Process where remote sites have been able to keep up and haven't been throttled, otherwise just let it run.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:49 PM, Kieren Diment <dim...@gmail.com> wrote: > Gearman's fine until you need a reliable queue. It's certainly less of a > pain to set up than rabbitmq, but if you start with gearman and find you > need reliability after a while there's substantial pain to be experienced > (unless you already know all about your reliable job queue implementation > of choice). > > On 05/03/2014, at 10:35 AM, Jérôme Étévé wrote: > > > - For queuing jobs, I'm a big fan of Gearman. It's light, very stable > > and very simple. > > >