On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Donald A. Tevault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> G. Matthew Rice wrote: > > >Yes. All of the courseware writers and book publishers have asked for > >the delay. the more meetings we had with partners, the more it became > >clear that they needed more time to catch up (present company excluded, > >though). > > I guess that's understandable, since they have to go through an entire > publishing process. (And, some of their stuff--like the current ExamCram > book--is way out-of-date, even according to the current exam objectives.) > The process is a bit faster for me, since I'm working solo, and can just > publish my stuff in a .pdf format. > I gently disagree if you are talking about the LPIC Level 1 Exam Cram 2, I'm doing a comprehensive review of it before I start the update and find it maps to over 85% of the current objectives, and I have independently confirmed this with several of my trusted circle of trainers. If you're talking about the original Exam Cram series, those are older than the hills and of course seriously out of date. It's always going to be hard to keep physical dead-tree books updated to the latest and greatest in an ever-changing market like certification, but even so an 85% mapping for a 4 year-old book is not bad. Ross Blog - http://opsamericas.com Video - http://youtube.com/novellvideo
_______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
