gregg wrote: > Bryan J. Smith wrote: > >> On Tue, 9/16/08, Andy Goldschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> So which 2 distributions adequately reflect the LPI >>> objectives ? >>> >>> >> I'm with others, use Debian and CentOS. >> >> >> > I must differ in opinion here. Although Debian and CentOS are very good > distros. Neither is Enterprise class like RHEL and SLES. Nor do either > Not to put too fine a spin on it, but last time I checked, CentOS is effectively RHEL...
I'd include it. The big difference is the lack of WS/AS/ES versions. There is only one CentOS, including the reduced package server version. > have as many functional and security certifications. I won't dispute the > fact that many distros are out their in use. I see enterprises running > Open SUSE, Fedora, ... The downside of these is they have a short life > cycle and require a lot more work to upgrade after 12 or 18 months. Most > Enterprise OS versions these days are supported and maintained for five > to seven years. Making them much better choices for a production OS in > development, staging, and production environments. > >> _______________________________________________ >> lpi-examdev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev >> >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > lpi-examdev mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev Cheers, Scott -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
_______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
