G. Matthew Rice wrote:
"G. Matthew Rice" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Last, but not least, I do hope that this examination tests security insight
of people and does not focus at remembering program parameters/switches ;)
Yeah. I've never had that comment thrown at me before :-?
I forgot another PS :)
PS - You still better know the switch and parameters that are used all the
time. An LPIC-1 that doesn't know 'ls -l'...umm, well isn't an
LPIC-1.
Regards,
Makes me wonder if there actually is a question "What is the parameter
to show a extended directory listing?" :)
My wish was not in particular against the current LPI certifications
btw, as I think common options should be known to prove someone is
familiar with the system, beside questions which test if people can
understand a given scenario and wrap that up to the correct answer.
However I got reminded to the "remember dry command switches and repeat"
last month, when learning for some other exams (non LPI)..
So, that's settled then, no parameters and command switches to remember
then! (j/k)
Thanks so far for listening to the input. It's nice to see things get
build up with more than just a few eyes looking at it.
Regards,
Michael
_______________________________________________
lpi-examdev mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
