From: Bryan J. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > In fact, all of Oracle's stuff is based on all of Red > Hat's developments. They've just built some fancy GUIs > around it. > They are into solving the "upper stack" aspects, whereas > Red Hat is more involved with the lower platform + > middleware.
I've "explained myself out" at this point. If people don't know things about what Red Hat does, and want to assume they don't ship things (let alone even develop the same features) like other distros, training, etc... (let alone often lead them), then I'm just waiting my time (and definitely being too verbose). <attitude> People who show off Oracle marketing remind me of those who show off Canonical marketing. I'm starting to adopt a complementary server quote ... "RHEL features are not cool until Oracle shows them off in their Unbreakable stack, and people assume Oracle developed them." To my long-standing, desktop quote ... "Red Hat developments already in released Fedora are not cool until they ship in Ubuntu, and people assume Canonical developed them." </attitude> -- Bryan J Smith Professional, Technical Annoyance [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linkedin.com/in/bjsmith ------------------------------------------------------ I'm a PC, but Linux -- Windows: Life Without Firewalls _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
