On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 06:37:14PM -0400, G. Matthew Rice wrote: > Just for everyone's info, I invited Len to join this list. Am I a glutton > for punishment or what? :)
I would love to see LPIC become a really nice test. I really would. Am I that bad? :) I think you actually invited me to join because I was complaining about the quality (at least in my opinion) of the LPIC tests. > Well, have I got a treat for you :) I'm about to launch a question writing > contest (hopefully, this evening, if I can get something that looks like 303 > objectives up) and I'll probably be scheduling an Item Review Meeting in > Mississauga. You are welcome to come. I will see if I can manage. > That's exactly my point. If the question was just: > > bless $ref, 'Hi'; > > I would have said it was a 'ls -l' question. '-r' is a nice option but I > wouldn't categorise it as an essential one. However, now that tac(1) is out > of the objectives, I don't know what people will do ;) I don't think I have ever seen 'bless' in any perl code I have ever dealt with. Given it appears OO related, that doesn't really surprise me at all. -- Len Sorensen _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
