On Wed, 2008-11-26 at 12:36 -0500, Bryan J. Smith wrote: > In several of my responses, both recently and prior, I mentioned a > possible "identification" aspect to what I'll call "alternative" or, > more recently, "deprecated" technologies and/or objectives. I did this > largely because some people insist on making the LPI objectives a list > of everything a Linux sysadmin should know -- so any training teaches > it? Although that objective is impossible, I think there is merit to at > least having an entry that ensures people are "aware" of either > "alternatives" or, even more relevant, "deprecated" technologies. > > I'll use LILO as the most recent example of "deprecated."
I do not know if such "identification" aspects should be included in the LPI objectives. But if so, perhaps this should include "deprecated" features such as LILO as well as "upcoming" features such as Upstart. Thanks, Mike _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
