On Wednesday 29 April 2009 09:56:19 Andy Goldschmidt wrote: > That topic doesn't suggest "chkconfig" at all. > > ======================================== > 101.3 > Description > Candidates should be able to manage the runlevel of the system. This > objective includes changing to single user mode, shutdown or rebooting > the system. Candidates should be able to alert users before switching > runlevel and properly terminate processes. This objective also includes > setting the default runlevel. > ======================================== > > Please can you include chkconfig in the partial list of files and the > description. > > What about "update-rc.d" - the Debian equivalent ?
And what about "rc-update", the Gentoo equivalent? Or "vi /etc/init.d/<some_arb_file>" followed by "ln -s /etc/init.d/<some_arb_file> /etc/rc.<num>/<stuff> for the truly hard-core? chkconfig, like "service", is purely a RedHat-ism - designed to work only with init.d scripts that contain the special comment marker used by chkconfig So it seems at odds with what LPI is all about - a generic cert that is applicable to Linux at large. "Red Hat does it like this" is never a valid reason to put something in the exam. -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
