On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Anselm Lingnau <[email protected]> wrote: > move. On the other hand, the mechanics of configuring TLS for LDAP are > conspicuosly similar to those of configuring TLS for Postfix or Apache, both > of which topics are in LPI-202 already, so it would be silly to move that bit > to LPI-303 because it is so advanced.
Hi Anselm, I just have time for a quick note (my SO is expecting some family time ;)). The idea of adding the LDAP security content to 303 wasn't meant as an 'either/or' scenario but a 'both'. The deliberate overlap is to address the idea that LDAP security issues are important for the LPIC-3 Security specialists after the pending LPIC-2 changes and how to address existing LPIC-2 holders when they go for their LPI-303 (they won't have the new LPIC-2). My part in this discussion is predicated on the answer being, "yes, it is still needed", too. Regards, -- G. Matthew Rice <[email protected]> gpg id: EF9AAD20 _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
