Marc Baudoin wrote: > Why make things difficult when it would be easy to make them > simpler?
I have been in the business of writing Linux training materials for more than ten years now and you can take it from me that there is no way to order the objectives that will not lead to unresolved forward references somewhere. At this point in time, changing the order of the objectives in the list for what amounts to cosmetic reasons will just cause confusion and serve no discernible purpose. Yes, there are books which will cover all the objectives in order. Yes, these books mostly suck (IMHO anyway). But arranging the objectives differently will just lead to new books that suck in a different way. For an instructor, there is no substitute for knowing *all* the material and being able to present it in a way that makes sense for the class participants (and of course what makes sense can and probably will differ from class to class). Why would one present one's class with the list of objectives and then explain that one is going to reorder them? I tell my classes I'm going to teach them Linux, and not to worry about the list of objectives at all. Anselm Disclaimer: This is my own opinion and not necessarily that of my employer. -- Anselm Lingnau ... Linup Front GmbH ... Linux-, Open-Source- & Netz-Schulungen [email protected], +49(0)6151-9067-103, Fax -299, www.linupfront.de Linup Front GmbH, Postfach 100121, 64201 Darmstadt, Germany Sitz: Weiterstadt (AG Darmstadt, HRB7705), Geschäftsführer: Oliver Michel _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
