Ian Shields wrote: > You could certainly make a case for not including which and type in > 104.7, but you could probably equally make a case for changing the > objective description so they belong more clearly.
And there's nothing stopping LPI Objectives from having commands and concepts cross and be located in multiple objectives. In fact, and Matt et al. should feel free to correct me if I'm wrong ... 1) The context is the objective, so ... 2) The scope of any implements (e.g., commands) are limited to the objective So from all of the discussions I've seen here, it may be best to put the commands in both sections. Exam writers just need to be keen on that 1-2 and recognize where these commands fit each section, often differently. I think this discussion may have very well exposed an excellent example of this. And it's good the OP brought it up, to remind us that these situations do exist. My overly opinionated $0.02 ... -- bjs _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
