Might want to add the note that duplication has been discussed and is considered desirable in this case.
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 9:48 AM, G. Matthew Rice <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 4:06 PM, Alessandro Selli > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 30/07/2015 at 21:31, Bryan J Smith wrote: >> >> [...] >> >>> So from all of the discussions I've seen here, it may be best to put >>> the commands in both sections. >> >> I agree. > > Hey everyone, > > I've added a proposed clarification to the wiki with type/which added to > 103.1: > > > http://wiki.lpi.org/wiki/LPIC-1_Objectives_V4#Proposed_Clarification_Addendum_.28Oct_1st.2C_2015.29 > > Regards, > --matt > > -- > G. Matthew Rice <[email protected]> gpg id: EF9AAD20 > _______________________________________________ > lpi-examdev mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev -- -- Bryan J Smith - http://www.linkedin.com/in/bjsmith _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
