[email protected] wrote: > My support for munin as easy & nice-looking capacity planning + Icinga > (as nagios successor) for monitoring.
We can probably bikeshed this until the cows come home. The advantage of collectd is that it is small, it measures the most important things, and it is reasonably easy to understand. Apart from that, if you have seen one monitoring tool you have more or less seen them all, and everybody is going to be using something different from everybody else anyway. If we put Nagios or Icinga on the exam, the next question is going to be where do we stop, since surely we don't want everyone to have to know all the 94 Nagios plugins in Debian Jessie, but the 10 plugins that you use are likely going to be different from the 10 plugins that I use or that Simone uses, while each one of us will argue vehemently that *our* plugins are the most important ones and absolutely must be on the exam while the others can get lost. Anselm -- Anselm Lingnau … Linup Front GmbH (MAX21) … Linux- & Open-Source-Schulungen [email protected], +49(0)6151-9067-0, Fax -299, www.linupfront.de Robert-Koch-Str. 9, 64331 Weiterstadt Post: Postf. 100121, 64201 Darmstadt DE Sitz: Weiterstadt (AG Darmstadt, HRB7705) Geschf: Oliver Michel, Nils Manegold _______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
