These types of objectives will always be difficult to keep "Scope Creep" from entering. that said ...
On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 2:43 PM, Anselm Lingnau < [email protected]> wrote: > [email protected] wrote: > > > My support for munin as easy & nice-looking capacity planning + Icinga > > (as nagios successor) for monitoring. > > We can probably bikeshed this until the cows come home. > > The advantage of collectd is that it is small, it measures the most > important > things, and it is reasonably easy to understand. Apart from that, if you > have > seen one monitoring tool you have more or less seen them all, and > everybody is > going to be using something different from everybody else anyway. > > If we put Nagios or Icinga on the exam, the next question is going to be > where > do we stop, since surely we don't want everyone to have to know all the 94 > Nagios plugins in Debian Jessie, but the 10 plugins that you use are likely > going to be different from the 10 plugins that I use or that Simone uses, > while each one of us will argue vehemently that *our* plugins are the most > important ones and absolutely must be on the exam while the others can get > lost. > > Anselm > -- > Anselm Lingnau … Linup Front GmbH (MAX21) … Linux- & > Open-Source-Schulungen > [email protected], +49(0)6151-9067-0, Fax -299, > www.linupfront.de > Robert-Koch-Str. 9, 64331 Weiterstadt Post: Postf. 100121, 64201 > Darmstadt DE > Sitz: Weiterstadt (AG Darmstadt, HRB7705) Geschf: Oliver Michel, Nils > Manegold > > _______________________________________________ > lpi-examdev mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev > -- -- Bryan J Smith - http://www.linkedin.com/in/bjsmith
_______________________________________________ lpi-examdev mailing list [email protected] http://list.lpi.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lpi-examdev
