On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > > > Umm... RedHat has a funny hybrid between FHS and FSSTND. Right now I > > > would say it's more FHS than FSSTND, so if I were you I'd seriously move > > > to FHS all the way with RedHat 7.0. > > > > Yeah, that's probably more accurate. We've been slowly moving, but I doubt > > we'll do anything dramatic before the LSB-final version of LHS is issued. > > Considering Red Hat's market-leading position, I think it's fair for > LSB to ask Red Hat to lead a little more aggressively than that.
You want us to move to a file system that isn't ready yet? We'll move to the LSB-final filesystem when it's ready. We're not going to move to a filesystem standard which is still subject to change. > regard will by itself effectively make or break the FHS. Therefore, > if Red Hat wants to make FHS work (and I am presuming that is true) Erik ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | "Who is John Galt?" - Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand | | | | Linux Application Development -- http://people.redhat.com/johnsonm/lad |
