On Mon, 20 Mar 2000, Nicholas Petreley wrote: > So even if Red Hat doesn't want to make this move, *someone* should. > Consider that a challenge to all the distro representatives here. ;)
The flip side is changing to FHS 2.0, then FHS 2.1, then LSB 1.0 would cause ongoing customer pain rather then a one-time event, and would likely make folks frustruated with the LSB. Erik ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | "Who is John Galt?" - Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand | | | | Linux Application Development -- http://people.redhat.com/johnsonm/lad |
