Andrew Josey writes: > All > Another update is now available, > at ftp://ftp.xopen.org/pub/lsb/test_suites/beta/ >
Hi Andrew, Thanks for the update. I think the following tests are incorrectly returning the FAIL code instead of FIP: 520|40 1 17369 1 1|Reference 5.11.1-1(C) 520|40 1 17369 1 2|If the subsystem is supported 520|40 1 17369 1 3|The /var/spool/lpd directory exists and is searchable 520|40 1 17369 1 4|/var/spool/lpd: directory not found 520|40 1 17369 1 5|exit code 1 returned, expected 0 520|40 1 17369 1 6|This test result needs to be manually resolved 220|40 1 1 21:09:16|FAIL 520|40 2 17369 1 1|Reference 5.11.1-2(C) 520|40 2 17369 1 2|If the implementation has the lpd daemon running then 520|40 2 17369 1 3|The lock file /var/spool/lpd/lpd.lock exists 520|40 2 17369 1 4|/var/spool/lpd/lpd.lock: file not found 520|40 2 17369 1 5|exit code 1 returned, expected 0 520|40 2 17369 1 6|This test result needs to be manually resolved 220|40 2 1 21:09:16|FAIL 520|42 1 17721 1 1|Reference 5.11.2-1(C) 520|42 1 17721 1 2|If the subsystem is supported 520|42 1 17721 1 3|The /var/spool/rwho directory exists and is searchable 520|42 1 17721 1 4|/var/spool/rwho: directory not found 520|42 1 17721 1 5|exit code 1 returned, expected 0 520|42 1 17721 1 6|This test result needs to be manually resolved, returning FIP result 220|42 1 1 21:09:18|FAIL Regards, Chris. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] IBM OzLabs Linux Development Group Canberra, Australia
