Candee Yes. There are a few more of these where I missed putting in a FAIL=N, prior to the call to tpresult FIP. I am updating all the affected tests today and a beta4 will hit the site later today. regards Andrew
On Jul 26, 11:43am in "Re: LSB-FHS2.2beta3 ", Candee Sumner wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > I also think this test is incorrectly returning the FAIL code instead of > FIP. > > 520|6 1 973 1 1|Reference 5.2.2-1(C) > 520|6 1 973 1 2|If man pages are supported > 520|6 1 973 1 3|The /var/cache/man directory exists and is searchable > 520|6 1 973 1 4|/var/cache/man: directory not found > 520|6 1 973 1 5|exit code 1 returned, expected 0 > 520|6 1 973 1 6|This test result needs to be manually resolved, > returning FIP result > 220|6 1 1 08:49:53|FAIL
