Chris: I found I needed to add a /pub in front of lsb/test_suites/... below to access the new test appropriately.
"ftp://ftp.freestandards.org/pub/lsb/test_suites/beta/binary/distribution"; Doug Christopher Yeoh wrote: > > Stew Benedict writes: > > > > On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Thorsten Kukuk wrote: > > > and a lot of segfaults: > > > unexpected signal 11 (SIGSEGV) received > > > > > > Looks like nealy all stramio/freopen tests seg.faults. > > > > > > I will now try to compile the testsuite myself on this machine. > > > > > > > Pretty much the same results here, many more failures than the > > lsb-distribution test 0.9-2. About 40 more failures and nearly 100 more > > unresolved. Also for both the last versions of the test the loop device > > is not released and the machine has to be rebooted to do another run. > > > > I've put up lsb-distribution-test-1.1.1-2.i386.rpm in > ftp://ftp.freestandards.org/lsb/test_suites/beta/binary/distribution > > This is identical to lsb-distribution-test-1.1.1-1.i386.rpm except it > wasn't compiled inside lsbdev. > > Stew and Thorsten could you give this one a go and see if you still > see the problems - this should determine whether its a problem with > lsbdev (or due to the recent changes or way I'm building the rpm). > > At the moment there seem to be conflicting results as > lsb-distribution-test-1.0-1.i386.rpm was compiled with lsbdev (which > some report as ok) and others have had problems with anything after > lsb-distribution-test-0.9-2.i386.rpm (the last to not use lsbdev) > > Chris > -- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > IBM OzLabs Linux Development Group > Canberra, Australia > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Douglas B. Beattie ------------------ Test Architect - Caldera, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
