On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Christopher Yeoh wrote: > I've put up lsb-distribution-test-1.1.1-2.i386.rpm in > ftp://ftp.freestandards.org/lsb/test_suites/beta/binary/distribution > > This is identical to lsb-distribution-test-1.1.1-1.i386.rpm except it > wasn't compiled inside lsbdev. > > Stew and Thorsten could you give this one a go and see if you still > see the problems - this should determine whether its a problem with > lsbdev (or due to the recent changes or way I'm building the rpm). > > At the moment there seem to be conflicting results as > lsb-distribution-test-1.0-1.i386.rpm was compiled with lsbdev (which > some report as ok) and others have had problems with anything after > lsb-distribution-test-0.9-2.i386.rpm (the last to not use lsbdev) >
Sorry for the slow response. Yes, this version brings the results back more in line with what I was seeing with 0.9-2. Stew Benedict -- MandrakeSoft OH/TN, USA http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~sbenedict/ PPC FAQ: http://www.linux-mandrake.com/en/demos/PPC/FAQ/
