[Resend, first attempt wasn't sent to the list] [email protected] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> I think this is one of the things urgently needed if we want to allow > people to keep using lsh/lshd, along with applying the Nettle 3 upgrade > patch². I agree an lsh-2.2 update is needed. There are also compilation problems with the argp subdir and gcc-5, due to the changed inline semantics. For nettle-3 and lsh-2.x, I'm considering doing the nettle3 update using dsa-compat.h instead, like in https://sources.debian.net/src/lsh-utils/2.1-7/debian/patches/nettle3.patch/ Unfortunately, I don't have too much hacking time, and I also have a Nettle release due soon. Co-maintainers welcome. I have filed the paperwork needed to get my employer (since a few weeks back I'm at google, Stockholm) to disclaim copyright interest in lsh development I do. I already have a similar clearance for Nettle. Regards, /Niels -- Niels Möller. PGP-encrypted email is preferred. Keyid C0B98E26. Internet email is subject to wholesale government surveillance. _______________________________________________ lsh-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/lsh-bugs
