Hi Niels! [email protected] (Niels Möller) skribis:
> [email protected] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> I think this is one of the things urgently needed if we want to allow >> people to keep using lsh/lshd, along with applying the Nettle 3 upgrade >> patch². > > I agree an lsh-2.2 update is needed. There are also compilation problems > with the argp subdir and gcc-5, due to the changed inline semantics. > > For nettle-3 and lsh-2.x, I'm considering doing the nettle3 update using > dsa-compat.h instead, like in > https://sources.debian.net/src/lsh-utils/2.1-7/debian/patches/nettle3.patch/ Either way is fine IMO. > Unfortunately, I don't have too much hacking time, and I also have a > Nettle release due soon. Co-maintainers welcome. I’m not volunteering ;-), but I guess that a minimal maintenance release fixing the build issues and upgrading the cipher suites would be enough. (I understand that it’s still quite a bit of work, but hopefully not as much as adding new features.) Cheers, Ludo’. _______________________________________________ lsh-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lysator.liu.se/mailman/listinfo/lsh-bugs
