Hi Chris,
1. I have doubt about "The aim of this document is to describe the problem 
space and standardize a way to signal dynamic flooding information.". Does the 
aim mean the draft describes the problem space and standardize the way for the 
centralized solution or mean the draft will standardize the way used for both 
the centralized solutions and the distributed solutions?
2. I explained in the previous mail the distributed solution includes more than 
the algorithms defined in the draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-00  and the 
overlapped signallings  defined in the 
draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-00/draft-li-dynamic-flooding-03. For example, 
it may define the standardized procedures for the distributed solutions. If 
there is such part, is it defined by draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 or 
draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction?

I hope you could clarify the above issues firstly for the adoption.


Thanks & Regards,
Zhenbin (Robin) 




________________________________________
发件人: Lsr [lsr-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Christian Hopps [cho...@chopps.org]
发送时间: 2019年2月11日 18:44
收件人: lsr@ietf.org
抄送: lsr-cha...@ietf.org; lsr-...@ietf.org; cho...@chopps.org
主题: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call for draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 + IPR poll.

Hi Folks,

We are starting a 2 week adoption call on draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02.

The aim of this document is to describe the problem space and standardize a way 
to signal dynamic flooding information. It does not standardize any specific 
algorithm for flooding topology creation.

Authors please respond indicating if you are aware of any IPR related to this 
work.

We also have another draft (draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-01) that started as 
a distributed flooding topology algorithm and morphed into that plus competing 
ideas on signaling of flooding topology information. The intent after adoption 
of draft-li-lsr-dynamic-flooding-02 is two-fold. One, the WG can discuss adding 
any signaling ideas from this work to the adopted signaling draft (with proper 
attribution given as appropriate), and two, for the authors of 
draft-cc-lsr-flooding-reduction-01 to publish a new document without the 
signaling portion and instead focus on their flooding topology algorithm. This 
new focused document can be considered in parallel along with the other 
algorithm work that has been proposed.

Flooding topology creation is seen as a hard problem for which we don't expect 
a one-size-fits-all solution. Taking the steps outlined above will help us move 
forward on the solutions.

Thanks,
Chris & Acee.
LSR WG Chairs.
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to