Hi Tony, Are you working on the assumption that there is no data link layer flow control already which could signal the OS congestion on the receiving end ?
Are we also working on the assumptions that when ISIS PDUs are send in DCs (unknown today case when out of the sudden 1000s of LSPs may need to get flooded) use of some L4 fancy flow control is an overkill and we must invent new essentially L2 flow control to cover this case to address partition repair ? Thx, R. On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 3:34 PM Tony Li <tony...@tony.li> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I’d like to continue the discussion that we left off with last night. > > The use case that I posited was a situation where we had 1000 LSPs to > flood. This is an interesting case that can happen if there was a large > network that partitioned and has now healed. All LSPs from the other side > of the partition are going to need to be updated. > > Let’s further suppose that the LSPs have an average size of 1KB. Thus, > the entire transfer is around 1MB. > > Suppose that we’re doing this on a 400Gb/s link. If we were to transmit > the whole batch of LSPs at once, it takes a whopping 20us. Not > milliseconds, microseconds. 2x10^-5s. Clearly, we are not going to be > rate limited by bandwidth. > > Note that 20us is an unreasonable lower bound: we cannot reasonably expect > a node to absorb 1k PDUs back to back without loss today, in addition to > all of it’s other responsibilities. > > At the opposite end of the spectrum, suppose we transmit one PDU every > 33ms. That’s then going to take us 33 seconds to complete. Unreasonably > slow. > > How can we then maximize our goodput? We know that the receiver has a set > of buffers and a processing rate that it can support. The processing rate > will vary, depending on other loads. > > What we would like the transmitter to do is to transmit enough to create a > small processing queue on the receiver and then transmit at the receiver’s > processing rate. > > Can we agree on this goal? > > Tony > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > Lsr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
