Hi Bruno,
> > [Bruno] Agreed so far. > Do we agree that draft-ietf-lsr-isis-area-proxy uses the SID/Label sub-TLV? > We both agree that this sub-TLV has no mention of the global flag nor the > routing algoto be used. So far, we do NOT have agreement on that. Your argument yesterday (backed by Robert) is pretty compelling: go ahead and assign a prefix and now the Area SID may be advertised as a Node SID in the Proxy LSP. If we take that direction, this discussion is moot. Tony
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
