Hi, Acee and Peter: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8362#section-3.12 has defined the Route-Tag Sub-TLV for External-Prefix, is it more straightforward to extend this sub-TLV to be included in other Prefix TLVs(Inter-Area-Prefix TLV, Intra-Area-Prefix TLV) to accomplish the aimed application scenario? And, do we need to cover multiple tag scenario? Even for external prefix, only one Route-Tag will be processed.
Anyway, I support its adoption. Best Regards Aijun Wang China Telecom -----Original Message----- From: lsr-boun...@ietf.org <lsr-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Christian Hopps Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2021 5:17 PM To: lsr@ietf.org Cc: lsr-cha...@ietf.org; Christian Hopps <cho...@chopps.org> Subject: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-acee-lsr-ospf-admin-tags-07 This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for the following draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-acee-lsr-ospf-admin-tags/ Please indicate your support or objection by January 19th, 2021. Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Thanks, Chris. _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
