<I should have sent this a few weeks ago when it got done>
FYI, Mahesh did the extraction of the mpls-te from draft-ietf-bfd-yang and it's
been submitted to the RFC Editor.
Regards,
Reshad.
On 2021-03-22, 3:30 PM, "Rtg-bfd on behalf of Yingzhen Qu"
<rtg-bfd-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of yingzhen.i...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
I also support the split of ietf-bfd-mpls-te module from the base BFD
module, so modules like ietf-ospf and ietf-isis can progress.
Thanks,
Yingzhen
> On Mar 22, 2021, at 2:33 AM, tom petch <ie...@btconnect.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> From: Rtg-bfd <rtg-bfd-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Reshad Rahman
<reshad=40yahoo....@dmarc.ietf.org>
> Sent: 19 March 2021 18:58
> To: rtg-bfd@ietf. org
> Subject: Draft minutes for BFD @ IETF110
>
> BFD WG,
>
> Draft minutes have been posted @
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-110-bfd/
>
> Please provide comments to the list by April 2nd.
> <tp>
>
> I support Acee's suggestion that the TE part should be split from the BFD
YANG draft so that the other three WG, who have been held up for years, can
progress.
>
> Tom Petch
>
> Copying the LSR WG.
>
>
> Meeting recording is @ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vSqfJJ3gOc0
>
> Regards,
> Reshad.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lsr mailing list
> Lsr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
