Hi, Christian: There are issues that are raised during the adoption call have not been solved or answered. What’s your criteria for adopting of one document then?
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/YszRKp3R22IawO_T--CjXRXuiVM/ https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/kbnwOs_K_d8fYKnae-yn3wcFlZQ/ Aijun Wang China Telecom > On May 21, 2021, at 23:06, Christian Hopps <cho...@chopps.org> wrote: > > > The work is adopted, authors please resubmit as: > > draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-transport-instance-00 > > Thanks, > Chris. > > Christian Hopps <cho...@chopps.org> writes: > >> This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for the following draft: >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-acee-lsr-ospf-transport-instance/ >> >> Please indicate your support or objection by May 16th, 2021. >> >> Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware of any >> IPR that applies to this draft. >> >> Historical Note: The original OSPF transport instance document was adopted >> by the OSPF WG back in 2009, it was last updated in 2014, and then revived >> as an individual submission to LSR in Sep 2020. :) >> >> Thanks, >> Chris. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lsr mailing list >> Lsr@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > Lsr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
