Aijun Wang <wangai...@tsinghua.org.cn> writes:
Hi, Christian: There are issues that are raised during the adoption call have not been solved or answered. What's your criteria for adopting of one document then?
1) The WG is interested and willing to work on a problem starting with the given document to get to a solution. 2) There is rough consensus on (1). Importantly: There's no requirement that the document be perfect, or complete, or even that every one agrees that it should be adopted. Thanks, Chris.
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/YszRKp3R22IawO_T--CjXRXuiVM/ https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/kbnwOs_K_d8fYKnae-yn3wcFlZQ/ Aijun Wang China Telecom On May 21, 2021, at 23:06, Christian Hopps <cho...@chopps.org> wrote: The work is adopted, authors please resubmit as: draft-ietf-lsr-ospf-transport-instance-00 Thanks, Chris. Christian Hopps <cho...@chopps.org> writes: This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for the following draft: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-acee-lsr-ospf-transport-ins tance/ Please indicate your support or objection by May 16th, 2021. Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware of any IPR that applies to this draft. Historical Note: The original OSPF transport instance document was adopted by the OSPF WG back in 2009, it was last updated in 2014, and then revived as an individual submission to LSR in Sep 2020. :) Thanks, Chris. _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
