Hi, Tony:
From: lsr-boun...@ietf.org <lsr-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Tony Li Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2022 4:20 AM To: Aijun Wang <wangai...@tsinghua.org.cn> Cc: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) <ginsberg=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org>; lsr <lsr@ietf.org>; Linda Dunbar <linda.dun...@futurewei.com> Subject: Re: [Lsr] Seeking feedback to the revised draft-dunbar-lsr-5g-edge-compute On Jan 10, 2022, at 9:05 AM, Aijun Wang <wangai...@tsinghua.org.cn <mailto:wangai...@tsinghua.org.cn> > wrote: [WAJ] Selecting the most appropriate/optimized application server should base on the topology information which is routing protocol related. Just because some mechanism wants to use toplogy information does NOT imply that it should be part of the routing protocol. In this case, load balancing should be an independent mechanism. If it wants to peek into the LSDB, that would be perfectly acceptable, IMHO. [WAJ] Current LSDB doesn't include the aggregated cost that can be used to select the optimal application server. If they are separated, the router should do the SPF calculation twice. Using the constrained SPF/flexalgo to achieve such optimal goal is certainly better than calculate twice. Tony
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
