On 25/01/2022 17:07, Robert Raszuk wrote:
Peter,
If a given PE needs to get all notifications from all other PEs it is
sufficient that it sends to local ABRs a single registration in a form
of 0.0.0.0/0 <http://0.0.0.0/0> and be done.
my calculation was done for case where each PE needs to register only
for 100 addresses of remote PEs. That's a small number but results in
100k registrations on each ABR, not even counting the inter-ABR ones.
Peter
But realistically speaking the case where services offered by a PE also
exist on all 100K other PEs would be pretty rare.
Thx,
R.
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 4:42 PM Peter Psenak <ppse...@cisco.com
<mailto:ppse...@cisco.com>> wrote:
On 25/01/2022 15:18, Robert Raszuk wrote:
> Peter,
>
> You clearly missed the added new sentence to section 4.3 in
version -01
>
> It is RECOMMENDED that the ABR register for the
> most specific prefix that is less specific than the original prefix.
I don't think so. I'm talking about PE to ABR registrations only. I
have
not even counted the inter-ABR ones.
Peter
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
