Hi John,
please see inline (##PP):
On 27/06/2023 17:48, John Scudder wrote:
Hi Authors,
I don’t think we’ve completely closed on this. Zahed is asking for Section 3 to
be tightened a little bit. The authors haven’t either said “no we won’t” or
proposed text. In hopes of provoking some forward motion, here’s an attempt of
my own, based on my understanding of the conversation so far. My straw man
suggestion is to insert this paragraph at the beginning of Section 3.1:
In this subsection, we illustrate one use case that motivates this
specification: if a specific service can be identified by an IP
address, traffic to it can use constraint-based paths computed
according to this specification.
Zahed, if this works for you, please ack. If it doesn’t work for you, please
propose text.
Authors, same to you.
##PP
I'm fine with your prposal.
Also, if you do decide to do another revision, can you fix this nit I noticed
in Section 5 of version 15? (There’s no need to cut a new version just for this
change, no doubt the RFC Editor would catch it too.)
OLD:
Only node that is participating in the Flex-Algorithm is:
* Able to compute path for such Flex-Algorithm
* Part of the topology for such Flex-Algorithm
NEW:
Only a node that is participating in a Flex-Algorithm is:
* Able to compute a path for such Flex-Algorithm
* Part of the topology for such Flex-Algorithm
(Adds the indefinite article in two places, changes definite article to
indefinite in one place.)
##PP
sure.
thanks,
Peter
Thanks,
—John
On Jun 9, 2023, at 11:30 AM, John Scudder <jgs=40juniper....@dmarc.ietf.org>
wrote:
Ok.
—John
On Jun 9, 2023, at 11:28 AM, Zaheduzzaman Sarker <zahed.sarker.i...@gmail.com>
wrote:
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
On Thu, 8 Jun 2023 at 15:09, John Scudder <j...@juniper.net> wrote:
Hi Zahed,
On Jun 8, 2023, at 6:42 AM, Zaheduzzaman Sarker <zahed.sarker.i...@gmail.com>
wrote:
I can help with text if I can understand use case better. Right now that is not
the case.
Do you understand the use case and intent of the section well enough now that
you’d be able to propose text?
Jhon, I think my latest responses to Peter’s mail should shed lights on what
part is missing in the example description. I think it is better that the
authors take a stab at it, then I will review and amend if needed.
Makes sense?
// Zahed
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!HM2JE8-oV_8v4Inl3lW3zP44k8Mds02JL35t9zRtVIiYXqW0WRekp4sGpHfoAE39uJKvVGD83RqfBcoYppfXRmgjZsKX$
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
