Hi Shehzad & Daniel,
> I support this work as it is key for summarization in an SRv6/IPv6 network. > Are you not going to advertise and leak across your IGP domain any of the SRv6 extensions as described in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9352/ for the PEs ? And if you do, is there still some use case for UPA ? Perhaps I am missing something but how would those extensions survive summarization ? Thx, Robert > On Aug 23, 2023, at 4:07 PM, Acee Lindem <acee.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > LSR Working Group, > > > > This begins the working group adoption call for “IGP Unreachable Prefix > Announcement” - draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-unreach-prefix-announce-04. > > Please indicate your support or objection on this list prior to > September 7th, 2023. > > > > Thanks, > > Acee > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > External Email: Please use caution when opening links and attachments / > Courriel externe: Soyez prudent avec les liens et documents joints > > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > Lsr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
