Hi, Acee: I admire your efforts for the LSR WG, but for the adoption call of this draft, you have not convinced me, although I gave you large amount of solid facts. Then, it's time to let our AD to step in, to make the non-biased judgement, based on our discussions along the adoption call.
We request the WG document be based on the https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wang-lsr-prefix-unreachable-annoucement/, because it is the first document to initiate the use case, provide the explicit signaling mechanism, and cover more scenarios. It’s unreasonable to adopt the follower solution and ignore the initiator. We started and lead the discussions THREE years earlier than the current proposal. Aijun Wang China Telecom > On Sep 8, 2023, at 23:16, Acee Lindem <acee.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The WG adoption call has completed and there is more than sufficient support > for adoption. > What’s more, vendors are implementing and operators are planning of deploying > the extensions. > Please republish the draft as draft-ietf-lsr-igp-ureach-prefix-announce-00. > > A couple of WG members, while acknowledging the use case, thought that it > would be better satisfied outside of the IGPs. > In fact, they both offered other viable alternatives. However, with the > overwhelming support and commitment to implementation > and deployment, we are going forward with WG adoption of this document. As > the Co-Chair managing the adoption, I don’t see > this optional mechanism as fundamentally changing the IGPs. > > There was also quite vehement opposition from the authors of > draft-wang-lsr-prefix-unreachable-annoucement. This draft > purports to support the same use case as well as others (the archives can be > consulted for the discussion). Further discussion > of this other draft and the use cases it addresses should be in the context > of draft-wang-lsr-prefix-unreachable-annoucement > and not the WG draft. > > Thanks, > Acee > >> On Aug 23, 2023, at 3:58 PM, Acee Lindem <acee.i...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> LSR Working Group, >> >> This begins the working group adoption call for “IGP Unreachable Prefix >> Announcement” - draft-ppsenak-lsr-igp-unreach-prefix-announce-04. >> Please indicate your support or objection on this list prior to September >> 7th, 2023. >> >> Thanks, >> Acee > > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > Lsr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
