Hi Acee,
Couple of other differences (I didn't dig to see whether they are justified):- 
Naming discrepancies e.g. TLV suffix is used more in OSPF (local-blocks v/s 
local-blocks-tlv)- No global blocks in ISIS- No capabilities in OSPF
Regards,Reshad.   

    On Tuesday, November 14, 2023, 10:11:02 AM EST, Acee Lindem 
<acee.i...@gmail.com> wrote:  
 
 Thanks Reshad - are there any other notable discrepancies? 

Thanks,
Acee

> On Nov 14, 2023, at 9:55 AM, Reshad Rahman 
> <reshad=40yahoo....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> My suggestion is that authors of these 2 documents spend some time together 
> to try to align the 2 documents. After that we can do YD review.
> 
> Regards,
> Reshad.
> 
> On Wednesday, November 1, 2023, 10:58:56 AM EDT, Reshad Rahman 
> <res...@yahoo.com> wrote: 
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Background: those 2 documents have just been assigned YD review, I am 
> reviewing OSPF and Jan is reviewing ISIS.
> 
> Was an effort made to keep those 2 documents aligned/in-sync where 
> possible/desirable? My expectation is that the SR specifics would be 
> near-identical in the 2 documents. e.g. shouldn't the capabilities for the 2 
> protocols be very similar.
> Here are some differences which don't seem justified:
> - sr-algorithm in ISIS is a uint8 and in OSPF is an identityref
> - range-size is a uint32 in ISIS and is a uint24 in OSPF
> 
> 
> augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols
> /rt:control-plane-protocol/isis:isis/isis:database
> /isis:levels/isis:lsp/isis:router-capabilities:
> +--ro sr-capability
> | +--ro sr-capability
> | | +--ro sr-capability-bits* identityref
> | +--ro global-blocks
> | +--ro global-block* []
> | +--ro range-size? uint32
> | +--ro sid-sub-tlv
> | +--ro sid? uint32
> +--ro sr-algorithms
> | +--ro sr-algorithm* uint8
> +--ro local-blocks
> | +--ro local-block* []
> | +--ro range-size? uint32
> | +--ro sid-sub-tlv
> | +--ro sid? uint32
> +--ro srms-preference
> +--ro preference? uint8
> 
> augment /rt:routing/rt:control-plane-protocols
> /rt:control-plane-protocol/ospf:ospf/ospf:areas/ospf:area
> /ospf:interfaces/ospf:interface/ospf:database
> /ospf:link-scope-lsa-type/ospf:link-scope-lsas
> /ospf:link-scope-lsa/ospf:version/ospf:ospfv2/ospf:ospfv2
> /ospf:body/ospf:opaque/ospf:ri-opaque:
> +--ro sr-algorithm-tlv
> | +--ro sr-algorithm* identityref
> +--ro sid-range-tlvs
> | +--ro sid-range-tlv* []
> | +--ro range-size? rt-types:uint24
> | +--ro sid-sub-tlv
> | +--ro sid? uint32
> +--ro local-block-tlvs
> | +--ro local-block-tlv* []
> | +--ro range-size? rt-types:uint24
> | +--ro sid-sub-tlv
> | +--ro sid? uint32
> +--ro srms-preference-tlv
> +--ro preference? uint8
> 
> 
> 
> Disclaimer: I don't follow LSR...
> 
> Regards,
> Reshad.
> _______________________________________________
> yang-doctors mailing list
> yang-doct...@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yang-doctors

  
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to