Hi Acee, > On Dec 7, 2023, at 3:44 PM, Acee Lindem <acee.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > > We’ll probably never BIS these RFCs but I would agree that it would be good > for one of the RFC authors to provide a clearer definition of the > relationship between the L flag, V flag, TLV length, and TLV values (label, > index, value). Since it seems a single flag indicating whether the value is > an MPLS label or index into an MPLS label range would have sufficed, this > description would certainly be beneficial to those new to IGP segment > routing. Also, it is unclear why an index/value ever needs to be 4 octets > when the value is bounded by the MPLS label space itself.
I went ahead and filed the erratum with the minimal language suggested by Tony. I don't think that prevents moving ahead with your suggestion also if the working group thinks it's worthwhile, but I didn't want to hold up the simple fix. --John _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
