Hi Hannes, Thanks for pointing this out:
> On Dec 7, 2023, at 4:38 AM, Hannes Gredler > <hannes=40gredler...@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > We have used similar textblocks for the OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 SR extensions and I > am not aware > of any questions from implementators around ambiguity. I checked RFCs 8665 and 8666, and they don't exhibit the same problem. Instead of indirecting the field definition to a different subsection, they take the more usual approach of defining it in line. So, all good as far as this issue is concerned. Thanks, --John _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
