Hello, I support the adoption of this document by the WG since it is a useful OSPF protocol extension.
I have the following comments for the authors to consider (post adoption): 1) Suggest to rename the capability bit to UnreachableLinkMetric to clearly distinguish it from all previous use of MaxMetric in OSPF. Also suggest to use this term through the document where the purpose is to mark the link as unreachable. 2) This document should introduce a new MaxLinkMetric which is 0xfffe which can be then used as a "link of last resort" as specified in RFC6987. 3) Section 3: There is no OSPF cost/metric in OSPFv2 Extended Link LSA. Also, not sure why the base OSPFv3 5340 has been excluded from this list where the Router LSA carries the link cost similar to OSPFv2. 4) This document should formally update the base OSPFv2/v3 RFCs since it changes the SPF. I hope this helps. Thanks, Ketan On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 10:58 AM Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > This email begins a 2 week WG adoption poll for the following > draft:https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gong-lsr-ospf-unreachable-link/ > > Please review the document and indicate your support or objections by March > 8th, 2024. > > Authors and contributors, please respond to the list indicating whether you > are aware of any IPR that applies to the draft. > > Thanks, > Yingzhen > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > Lsr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
