Hi Les,



Thank you for your comments and providing RFC 5305 as a reference. 





We will review the entire document and update it to ensure a more accurate 
description. 





Best Regards,


Liyan







----邮件原文----发件人:"Les Ginsberg \\(ginsberg\\)" 
<ginsberg=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org>收件人:Yingzhen Qu  
<yingzhen.i...@gmail.com>,lsr  <lsr@ietf.org>,lsr-chairs <lsr-cha...@ietf.org>抄 
送: (无)发送时间:2024-03-04 12:23:08主题:Re: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call - 
draft-gong-lsr-ospf-unreachable-link(02/23/24 - 03/08/24)
    

I support WG adoption of this draft.


Being able to advertise a link that is not used in the base SPF is a useful 
functionality to have.


 


I do think that the language currently used in the draft could be improved.


Currently the draft says:


 


“there are requirements to advertise unreachable


   links in OSPF for purposes other than building the normal Shortest


   Path Tree.”


 


The term “unreachable link” is a misnomer. If the link were truly unreachable 
it couldn’t be used for any purpose.


I would suggest the language be changed to more closely mimic RFC 5305:


 


“If a link is advertised with the maximum link metric (2^24 - 1), this


   link MUST NOT be considered during the normal SPF computation.  This


   will allow advertisement of a link for purposes other than building


   the normal Shortest Path Tree.”


 


“MUST NOT be considered” is a much more accurate description than “unreachable”.


 


I leave it to the authors to decide how best to revise the draft language.


 


   Les


 


 




From: Lsr <lsr-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Yingzhen Qu Sent: Thursday, 
February 22, 2024 9:28 PM To: lsr <lsr@ietf.org> lsr-chairs 
<lsr-cha...@ietf.org> Subject: [Lsr] WG Adoption Call - 
draft-gong-lsr-ospf-unreachable-link (02/23/24 - 03/08/24)




 

Hi,   This email begins a 2 week WG adoption poll for the following draft: 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gong-lsr-ospf-unreachable-link/   Please 
review the document and indicate your support or objections by March 8th, 2024. 
Authors and contributors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are 
aware of any IPR that applies to the draft. Thanks, Yingzhen 






_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list
Lsr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr

Reply via email to