I support the proposed change as modified by Chris's comment that the target should be to use Expert Review. In this way all IS-IS codepoint registries would be handled in a consistent manner and all would allow any class of RFC - including Experimental - to obtain a code point when appropriate.
In addition, I would like to put out a challenge to our wonderful team of WG chairs, AD, and even the IESG review process: Let's see if we can get this whole process done in three months: 1 month to adopt 1 month to last call 1 month to complete IESG review This is a non-controversial administrative change - I see no reason why this process need take longer than that. Tony - friendly suggestion to trigger momentum - update the draft based on Chris's suggestion and ask for WG adoption. Les > -----Original Message----- > From: Lsr <lsr-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Tony Li > Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2024 8:54 AM > To: Christian Hopps <cho...@chopps.org> > Cc: lsr <lsr@ietf.org> > Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for > draft-li-lsr-labv-registration- > 00.txt > > > Fair point. I can live with that. > > T > > > > On Apr 20, 2024, at 12:20 AM, Christian Hopps <cho...@chopps.org> > wrote: > > > > [as wg-member] > > > > Any reason not to use Expert Review? FWIW, this is the only registry for > > IS-IS > that doesn't. > > > > Thanks, > > Chris. > > > > Tony Li <tony...@tony.li> writes: > > > >> Hi folks, > >> > >> This is a proposal to change the registration procedure on the IS-IS > >> Neighbor Link-Attribute Bit Values registry. > >> > >> It’s currently “Standards Action”. I’m proposing that we change it > >> to “IETF Review”. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> T > >> > >> > >> > >> Begin forwarded message: > >> > >> From: internet-dra...@ietf.org > >> Subject: New Version Notification for > >> draft-li-lsr-labv-registration-00.txt > >> Date: April 19, 2024 at 10:39:21 AM PDT > >> To: "Tony Li" <tony...@tony.li> > >> > >> A new version of Internet-Draft > >> draft-li-lsr-labv-registration-00.txt has been > >> successfully submitted by Tony Li and posted to the > >> IETF repository. > >> > >> Name: draft-li-lsr-labv-registration > >> Revision: 00 > >> Title: Revision to Registration Procedures for IS-IS Neighbor > >> Link-Attribute Bit Values > >> Date: 2024-04-18 > >> Group: Individual Submission > >> Pages: 2 > >> URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/ > >> draft-li-lsr-labv-registration-00.txt > >> Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/ > >> draft-li-lsr-labv-registration/ > >> HTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/ > >> draft-li-lsr-labv-registration > >> > >> > >> Abstract: > >> > >> RFC 5029, "Definition of an IS-IS Link Attribute Sub-TLV", > >> defines a > >> registry for "IS-IS Neighbor Link-Attribute Bit Values". This > >> document changes the registration procedure for that registry > >> from > >> "Standards Action" to "IETF Review". > >> > >> > >> > >> The IETF Secretariat > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Lsr mailing list > >> Lsr@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Lsr mailing list > > Lsr@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > Lsr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
