Dear LSR chairs, It’s been a week and you haven’t even given Les a polite response. Will you take up this challenge?
Could we please start a WG adoption call? Tony > On Apr 23, 2024, at 4:21 PM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) > <ginsberg=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > I support the proposed change as modified by Chris's comment that the target > should be to use Expert Review. > In this way all IS-IS codepoint registries would be handled in a consistent > manner and all would allow any class of RFC - including Experimental - to > obtain a code point when appropriate. > > In addition, I would like to put out a challenge to our wonderful team of WG > chairs, AD, and even the IESG review process: Let's see if we can get this > whole process done in three months: > > 1 month to adopt > 1 month to last call > 1 month to complete IESG review > > This is a non-controversial administrative change - I see no reason why this > process need take longer than that. > > Tony - friendly suggestion to trigger momentum - update the draft based on > Chris's suggestion and ask for WG adoption. > > Les > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Lsr <lsr-boun...@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Tony Li >> Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2024 8:54 AM >> To: Christian Hopps <cho...@chopps.org> >> Cc: lsr <lsr@ietf.org> >> Subject: Re: [Lsr] New Version Notification for >> draft-li-lsr-labv-registration- >> 00.txt >> >> >> Fair point. I can live with that. >> >> T >> >> >>> On Apr 20, 2024, at 12:20 AM, Christian Hopps <cho...@chopps.org> >> wrote: >>> >>> [as wg-member] >>> >>> Any reason not to use Expert Review? FWIW, this is the only registry for >>> IS-IS >> that doesn't. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Chris. >>> >>> Tony Li <tony...@tony.li> writes: >>> >>>> Hi folks, >>>> >>>> This is a proposal to change the registration procedure on the IS-IS >>>> Neighbor Link-Attribute Bit Values registry. >>>> >>>> It’s currently “Standards Action”. I’m proposing that we change it >>>> to “IETF Review”. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> T >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Begin forwarded message: >>>> >>>> From: internet-dra...@ietf.org >>>> Subject: New Version Notification for >>>> draft-li-lsr-labv-registration-00.txt >>>> Date: April 19, 2024 at 10:39:21 AM PDT >>>> To: "Tony Li" <tony...@tony.li> >>>> >>>> A new version of Internet-Draft >>>> draft-li-lsr-labv-registration-00.txt has been >>>> successfully submitted by Tony Li and posted to the >>>> IETF repository. >>>> >>>> Name: draft-li-lsr-labv-registration >>>> Revision: 00 >>>> Title: Revision to Registration Procedures for IS-IS Neighbor >>>> Link-Attribute Bit Values >>>> Date: 2024-04-18 >>>> Group: Individual Submission >>>> Pages: 2 >>>> URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/ >>>> draft-li-lsr-labv-registration-00.txt >>>> Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/ >>>> draft-li-lsr-labv-registration/ >>>> HTMLized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/ >>>> draft-li-lsr-labv-registration >>>> >>>> >>>> Abstract: >>>> >>>> RFC 5029, "Definition of an IS-IS Link Attribute Sub-TLV", >>>> defines a >>>> registry for "IS-IS Neighbor Link-Attribute Bit Values". This >>>> document changes the registration procedure for that registry >>>> from >>>> "Standards Action" to "IETF Review". >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The IETF Secretariat >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Lsr mailing list >>>> Lsr@ietf.org >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Lsr mailing list >>> Lsr@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lsr mailing list >> Lsr@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list > Lsr@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list Lsr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/lsr
