Hi All, I thank the authors for the work on this draft and support its publication. This work was very much needed for the enablement of new feature sets in ISIS networks and the specification will aid interoperability.
My only "grudge" is something that I have brought up previously on this draft [1] and perhaps there may still be some interest in the WG/authors to take care of them? 1) Mandate that the non-key part is identical in all the parts and if not recommend that the value in the first part is taken. Or, say something about handling this condition than saying "error and out of scope". 2) Since the early versions of the draft, a lot of effort has been put on cataloguing TLV/sub-TLVs and their applicability for MP. From there, it is only one more step to actually specify the "key" and "non-key" parts of TLVs (where this is not done already) in an appendix section. This is important for interoperability. The draft today covers two of the most prominent TLVs but does not cover the others. That said, I won't hold this document if I am in the rough on this. Thanks, Ketan [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/lsr/qQkeAHnw2qjrGoySbES4EVafgY4/ On Tue, Jul 2, 2024 at 11:39 AM Yingzhen Qu <yingzhen.i...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > This email begins a 2 week WG Last Call for the following draft: > draft-ietf-lsr-multi-tlv-01 - Multi-part TLVs in IS-IS > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-multi-tlv/> > > Please review the document and indicate your support or objections by July > 15th, 2024. > > Authors, > > Please indicate to the list, your knowledge of any IPR related to this work. > > Thanks, Yingzhen > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list -- lsr@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to lsr-le...@ietf.org >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- lsr@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to lsr-le...@ietf.org
