Mohamed Boucadair has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding-algorithm-04: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-dynamic-flooding-algorithm/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Sarah and Tony, Thank you for the effort put into this specification. Thanks to Luigi Iannone for the OPSDIR review. Several of his points are still applicable to this version. # I strongly suggest to rework the abstract (and also several parts of the document) as several statements are really weird for an IETF document. Such statements are OK if this was an individual contribution. # Appreciate the experiment scope and goals, however, the document assumes a binary approach: progress the algo as it is or retire. If the experiment is endorsed by operators, a possible outcome might be to adjust part of the algorithm to comply with real operational conditions. # As this is about an algo for centralized mode, why it matters to have it specified in an RFC? Are there interoperability considerations that are important to consider? If so, please indicate those in the text. Cheers, Med _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
