Hi Med, > # Appreciate the experiment scope and goals, however, the document assumes a > binary approach: progress the algo as it is or retire. If the experiment is > endorsed by operators, a possible outcome might be to adjust part of the > algorithm to comply with real operational conditions.
If ‘adjusted’, then it becomes a different algorithm and necessarily a different RFC. > # As this is about an algo for centralized mode, why it matters to have it > specified in an RFC? Are there interoperability considerations that are > important to consider? If so, please indicate those in the text. This should be published as part of the normal scientific/engineering method. When we make progress, we publish our results for the community to review and comment. It is after all a “Request For Comments”. Others may critique it or improve upon it. If it is not published, then it goes to the great bitbucket in the sky, and knowledge and potential progress is lost. Regards, Tony _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
