Hello Li,
Thanks for the review. Responses inline.....
Ron
________________________________
From: zhangli (CE) <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, August 21, 2026 4:09 AM
To: Christian Hopps <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected]
<[email protected]>; [email protected]
<[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-many-lsr-power-group-03 (Ends
2026-08-30)
Hi All,
I have reviewed this draft and have a few comments. Please let me know if I
have misunderstood anything.
1. General comment: This draft introduces several new TLVs/sub-TLVs but does
not clearly explain their necessity or usage. If this information is already
covered in draft-many-teas-power-steering, please add a reference to that
draft. Otherwise, it would be helpful to provide more context to make it easier
for readers to understand. For example, why is the Unidirectional Sleeping
Bandwidth Sub-TLV needed, and how should it be used?
[rb] Please see draft-many-teas-power-steering, Section 6.
2. Interface PSP Sub-TLV: The definition of the Interface PSP sub-TLV is
somewhat confusing. Section 2.1 defines PSP as "Power Saving Potential," this
concept is abstract. From the discussion on the mailing list, I understand it
is the power that may be saved if a power group goes to sleep. It is
recommended to provide more clarification on this point.
[rb] Please see draft-many-teas-power-steering, Section 3 and Section 6.3.
3. Unidirectional Sleeping Bandwidth Sub-TLV: The definition of sleeping
bandwidth in this draft is not aligned with draft-many-teas-power-steering.
In this draft, it is defined as: "the maximum bandwidth [RFC5305] minus the
bandwidth currently allocated to RSVP-TE label switched paths that was
transitioned to power-sleep."
While in draft-many-teas-power-steering, it is defined as: "this value
represents the sleeping bandwidth on a link."
It is recommended to align these definitions to avoid confusion.
[rb] Good catch. I will fix this to align with the
draft-many-teas-power-steering
I hope these comments can be addressed before the draft is adopted.
Best regards
Li
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Christian Hopps via Datatracker <[email protected]>
发送时间: 2026年8月17日 8:57
收件人: [email protected]
抄送: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
主题: [Lsr] WG adoption call for draft-many-lsr-power-group-03 (Ends 2026-08-30)
Hi Folks,
This begins a 2 week WG Adoption Call for the following draft:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-many-lsr-power-group/__;!!NpxR!g0n9IEp4Z5EWJR38fpoyS5T9s-SbPrKZnCvnWIh2mlrMYP6S8fgWrzaaBxTkP0gdEmfkLXBYm-jtQseIVmFG$
Please indicate your support or objections by August 30th, 2026.
An IPR declaration has been made
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-many-lsr-power-group__;!!NpxR!g0n9IEp4Z5EWJR38fpoyS5T9s-SbPrKZnCvnWIh2mlrMYP6S8fgWrzaaBxTkP0gdEmfkLXBYm-jtQkmKKmlx$
Authors, please respond to the list indicating whether you are aware of any
other IPR that applies to this draft.
Thanks,
Chris.
[Call for adoption end date (2026-08-30)]
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Lsr mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
