Hi Tony, > If an interface is not power sleep capable, then its PSP is not relevant in metric computation.
Why would you say so ? I can see some links (or even entire parts of topologies) which do not have any power saving potential configured but they could be used just fine for taking some traffic from links designated for sleeping under lower load. If you assume that only links participating in power savings should be part of it I think this is significantly problematic. Thx, R. On Sat, Aug 29, 2026 at 5:10 PM Tony Li <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Li, > > > Thanks for response, but I am still confused. For example, how the > Sleeping Adjacencies TLV and Power-Sleep Capable Bit are used for path > computation? Could you please provide an example? > > > > Path computation cares about which links are sleeping. If it cannot find > a path with non-sleeping links, then it needs to think about which sleeping > links should be awakened. > > If an interface is not power sleep capable, then its PSP is not relevant > in metric computation. > > Regards, > Tony > > > > _______________________________________________ > Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
