Mike Bishop has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-lsr-l2-bundle-member-remote-id-10: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-l2-bundle-member-remote-id/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # IESG review of draft-ietf-lsr-l2-bundle-member-remote-id-10 CC @MikeBishop ## Comments ### Section 1, paragraph 3 RFC 9356 defines a Local/Remote Interface ID sub-TLV (OSPFv2 sub-TLV 9), marked "N" for use within the L2 Bundle Member Attributes sub-TLV. A sentence on why a new remote-only sub-TLV was preferred over permitting sub-TLV 9 there would help readers who know the existing one. ## Notes This review is in the ["IETF Comments" Markdown format][ICMF]. You can use the [`ietf-comments` tool][ICT] to automatically convert this review into individual GitHub issues. Review generated by the [`ietf-reviewtool`][IRT]. [ICMF]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md [ICT]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments [IRT]: https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
