Mike - Thanx for the review. Please see inline.
>-----Original Message----- >From: Mike Bishop via Datatracker <[email protected]> >Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2026 5:08 PM >To: The IESG <[email protected]> >Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; >[email protected]; [email protected] >Subject: Mike Bishop's No Objection on draft-ietf-lsr-l2-bundle-member- >remote-id-10: (with COMMENT) > >Mike Bishop has entered the following ballot position for >draft-ietf-lsr-l2-bundle-member-remote-id-10: No Objection > >When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >introductory paragraph, however.) > > >Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling- >ballot-positions/ >for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > >The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lsr-l2-bundle-member-remote-id/ > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >COMMENT: >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > ># IESG review of draft-ietf-lsr-l2-bundle-member-remote-id-10 > >CC @MikeBishop > >## Comments > >### Section 1, paragraph 3 > >RFC 9356 defines a Local/Remote Interface ID sub-TLV (OSPFv2 sub-TLV 9), >marked >"N" for use within the L2 Bundle Member Attributes sub-TLV. A sentence on >why a >new remote-only sub-TLV was preferred over permitting sub-TLV 9 there would >help >readers who know the existing one. > [LES:] The sub-TLV you are referring is defined in https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8379/#section-4.3 and it provides a pair of interface IDs (Local and Remote). That is not usable here because the Local ID has already been advertised as part of the Bundle Descriptor. We require a sub-TLV that only advertises the Remote Interface ID. Les >## Notes > >This review is in the ["IETF Comments" Markdown format][ICMF]. You can use >the >[`ietf-comments` tool][ICT] to automatically convert this review into >individual GitHub issues. Review generated by the [`ietf-reviewtool`][IRT]. > >[ICMF]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments/blob/main/format.md >[ICT]: https://github.com/mnot/ietf-comments >[IRT]: https://github.com/larseggert/ietf-reviewtool > > _______________________________________________ Lsr mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
