>>>>> "Paul" == Paul Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Luke> what I am currently looking for is a way to keep the configs Luke> in cvs or similar, then automatically deply first to test, Luke> then to production. >> >> We actually have a paper in at LISA this year about using this >> sort of technique with bcfg2. There are a bunch of corner cases >> that makes this a little tricky, but there are a ton of nifty >> things that you can do (including configuration transactions and >> workflows) if you do it right. Paul> We have been doing this for a while. Recently, it has been Paul> formalised more & we now have several different flavours of Paul> machines with different levels of "stability". Production Paul> machines get a weekly update which has been in test on Paul> "development" machines for the previous week. Out of curiosity, does the LCFG server know anything about the revision control system, or is the change management functionality handled entirely externally? -nld _______________________________________________ lssconf-discuss mailing list lssconf-discuss@inf.ed.ac.uk http://lists.inf.ed.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/lssconf-discuss
